<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 578 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328869</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalty imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. It was held that since the appellant had paid the service tax and interest before the show cause notice was issued, no penalty should be imposed. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of timely compliance with tax obligations and overturned the penalty while upholding the demand for service tax and interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 15:03:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431894" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 578 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328869</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalty imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. It was held that since the appellant had paid the service tax and interest before the show cause notice was issued, no penalty should be imposed. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of timely compliance with tax obligations and overturned the penalty while upholding the demand for service tax and interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328869</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>