<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 577 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328868</link>
    <description>Inputs cleared as such to a sister unit after reversal of Cenvat credit were not required to be valued by reference to the price at which similar inputs were sold to independent buyers. The governing valuation rule and Board circular distinguished between removals as such by sale and transfers to a sister unit without sale, and for intra-group transfer the relevant approach was the valuation framework based on the invoice value on which credit was originally taken. The earlier identical ruling also rejected loading post-manufacturing elements into the amount payable. The lower authorities&#039; valuation was therefore unsustainable, and the assessee&#039;s appeal succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2016 13:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431887" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 577 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328868</link>
      <description>Inputs cleared as such to a sister unit after reversal of Cenvat credit were not required to be valued by reference to the price at which similar inputs were sold to independent buyers. The governing valuation rule and Board circular distinguished between removals as such by sale and transfers to a sister unit without sale, and for intra-group transfer the relevant approach was the valuation framework based on the invoice value on which credit was originally taken. The earlier identical ruling also rejected loading post-manufacturing elements into the amount payable. The lower authorities&#039; valuation was therefore unsustainable, and the assessee&#039;s appeal succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328868</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>