<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 574 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328865</link>
    <description>Goods manufactured and cleared for use in biomass energy boiler systems were treated as eligible for exemption under Notification No. 6/2000-CE as non-conventional energy devices or systems listed in List 9. The Tribunal applied the broad wording of the notification to waste-to-energy conversion equipment, holding that identifiable components supplied on site, even in knocked down form, do not lose exemption merely because they are delivered in parts if they form an integral part of the device and serve the notified end-use. On that reading, the goods fell within the plain language of the exemption and denial of relief was not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2016 16:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431884" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 574 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328865</link>
      <description>Goods manufactured and cleared for use in biomass energy boiler systems were treated as eligible for exemption under Notification No. 6/2000-CE as non-conventional energy devices or systems listed in List 9. The Tribunal applied the broad wording of the notification to waste-to-energy conversion equipment, holding that identifiable components supplied on site, even in knocked down form, do not lose exemption merely because they are delivered in parts if they form an integral part of the device and serve the notified end-use. On that reading, the goods fell within the plain language of the exemption and denial of relief was not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>