<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 573 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328864</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the order dropping interest demand for the period preceding the retrospective duty imposition date. The decision aligned with established legal principles, emphasizing that interest on duty retrospectively levied under the Finance Act, 2011, is not chargeable for the period before the enactment date when duty was not payable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431883" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 573 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328864</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the order dropping interest demand for the period preceding the retrospective duty imposition date. The decision aligned with established legal principles, emphasizing that interest on duty retrospectively levied under the Finance Act, 2011, is not chargeable for the period before the enactment date when duty was not payable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328864</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>