<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 569 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328860</link>
    <description>Exemption under Notification No. 6/2002-CE could not be denied merely because a photocopy of the prescribed certificate was filed before clearance and the original was produced later. The notification required production of the certificate before clearance, but it did not insist on the original alone being submitted to the department. As the certificate&#039;s correctness and the assessee&#039;s entitlement to exemption were undisputed, the later production of the original cured the technical objection. The exemption was therefore restored and the impugned orders were set aside with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 14:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431879" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 569 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328860</link>
      <description>Exemption under Notification No. 6/2002-CE could not be denied merely because a photocopy of the prescribed certificate was filed before clearance and the original was produced later. The notification required production of the certificate before clearance, but it did not insist on the original alone being submitted to the department. As the certificate&#039;s correctness and the assessee&#039;s entitlement to exemption were undisputed, the later production of the original cured the technical objection. The exemption was therefore restored and the impugned orders were set aside with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328860</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>