<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 636 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183613</link>
    <description>Relief under clause (c) of Rule 57AC of the Central Excise Rules was confirmed for the appellant, and the earlier judgment was clarified accordingly. The text records that the appellant was entitled to that relief, resolving the issue in its favour under the cited rule.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 14:40:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431877" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 636 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183613</link>
      <description>Relief under clause (c) of Rule 57AC of the Central Excise Rules was confirmed for the appellant, and the earlier judgment was clarified accordingly. The text records that the appellant was entitled to that relief, resolving the issue in its favour under the cited rule.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183613</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>