<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 787 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183612</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, but the Supreme Court found no merit in the review petition after examining the petition and connected records. The review petition was therefore dismissed. The order records no further substantive ruling on the underlying central excise controversy and is limited to the disposal of the review application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 14:36:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431876" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 787 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183612</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, but the Supreme Court found no merit in the review petition after examining the petition and connected records. The review petition was therefore dismissed. The order records no further substantive ruling on the underlying central excise controversy and is limited to the disposal of the review application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183612</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>