https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3838 A writ petition confined to challenging only the consequential dismissal of an appeal for non-compliance with a statutory pre-deposit direction was held not maintainable where the petitioner had not assailed either the underlying assessment order or the pre-deposit order itself. The stated principle is that a challenge to a derivative dismissal cannot succeed while the foundation orders remain unchallenged, because the adverse consequence flows from those unreversed orders. The petition was dismissed on that basis. en-us Tue, 21 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Oct 2009 17:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3838 A writ petition confined to challenging only the consequential dismissal of an appeal for non-compliance with a statutory pre-deposit direction was held not maintainable where the petitioner had not assailed either the underlying assessment order or the pre-deposit order itself. The stated principle is that a challenge to a derivative dismissal cannot succeed while the foundation orders remain unchallenged, because the adverse consequence flows from those unreversed orders. The petition was dismissed on that basis. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 21 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3838