<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 563 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328854</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the CIT (Appeals) and the Tribunal, dismissing the tax appeal. It emphasized that divergence in opinion on tax liability did not warrant penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The Court stressed the significance of accurate furnishing of facts and referenced relevant Supreme Court decisions to support its ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 13:46:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431857" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 563 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328854</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the CIT (Appeals) and the Tribunal, dismissing the tax appeal. It emphasized that divergence in opinion on tax liability did not warrant penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The Court stressed the significance of accurate furnishing of facts and referenced relevant Supreme Court decisions to support its ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328854</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>