<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 554 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328845</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions of Rs. 55 lakhs made by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal found that the entire income of Rs. 90 lakhs surrendered by the assessee during a survey was correctly spread over two years for tax purposes, with Rs. 35 lakhs offered in the assessment year 2007-08 and the balance in the subsequent year. The addition of Rs. 55 lakhs by the AO was deemed unjustified as there was no evidence of property sale to warrant tax on unrealized sale price.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 11:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 554 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328845</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions of Rs. 55 lakhs made by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal found that the entire income of Rs. 90 lakhs surrendered by the assessee during a survey was correctly spread over two years for tax purposes, with Rs. 35 lakhs offered in the assessment year 2007-08 and the balance in the subsequent year. The addition of Rs. 55 lakhs by the AO was deemed unjustified as there was no evidence of property sale to warrant tax on unrealized sale price.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328845</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>