<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 553 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328844</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision in a case involving disputes over the correct value for cost of indexation and fair market value of land sold by the assessee. The ITAT supported the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition made by the Assessing Officer and to estimate the fair market value at Rs. 25 per sq. mtr. The ITAT dismissed challenges to the assessment order based on violation of natural justice, emphasizing the significance of fair market valuation and consideration of locational advantages in determining land value for computing capital gains.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 15:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431847" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 553 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328844</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision in a case involving disputes over the correct value for cost of indexation and fair market value of land sold by the assessee. The ITAT supported the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition made by the Assessing Officer and to estimate the fair market value at Rs. 25 per sq. mtr. The ITAT dismissed challenges to the assessment order based on violation of natural justice, emphasizing the significance of fair market valuation and consideration of locational advantages in determining land value for computing capital gains.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328844</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>