https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183600 The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was treated as a complete code for acquisition proceedings, so once the Section 4(1) notification and Section 6 declaration were published, the process crystallised and later statutory stages could follow. Civil court jurisdiction under Section 9 CPC was held excluded by necessary implication for challenges to the legality of the notification and declaration, with such objections available only under Article 226. Because possession had already been taken and handed over, the trial court lacked jurisdiction to grant interim injunction. The civil suit was therefore not maintainable, and the injunction orders were without jurisdiction and unsustainable. en-us Thu, 27 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Jun 2016 11:04:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183600 The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was treated as a complete code for acquisition proceedings, so once the Section 4(1) notification and Section 6 declaration were published, the process crystallised and later statutory stages could follow. Civil court jurisdiction under Section 9 CPC was held excluded by necessary implication for challenges to the legality of the notification and declaration, with such objections available only under Article 226. Because possession had already been taken and handed over, the trial court lacked jurisdiction to grant interim injunction. The civil suit was therefore not maintainable, and the injunction orders were without jurisdiction and unsustainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 27 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183600