<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (11) TMI 453 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183601</link>
    <description>A special acquisition statute providing a complete code impliedly bars a civil suit challenging acquisition proceedings when statutory remedies remain available, so the suit was not maintainable. The Land Acquisition Officer also retained jurisdiction to complete the enquiry and make the award because the acquisition had not been formally withdrawn in the manner prescribed by the Act; a mere stoppage of further steps at the request of the Gram Panchayat did not terminate the proceedings. The challenge to the acquisition and award therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 11:04:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (11) TMI 453 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183601</link>
      <description>A special acquisition statute providing a complete code impliedly bars a civil suit challenging acquisition proceedings when statutory remedies remain available, so the suit was not maintainable. The Land Acquisition Officer also retained jurisdiction to complete the enquiry and make the award because the acquisition had not been formally withdrawn in the manner prescribed by the Act; a mere stoppage of further steps at the request of the Gram Panchayat did not terminate the proceedings. The challenge to the acquisition and award therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183601</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>