<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 958 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183596</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay dismissed the appeal and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to remand the case for the Assessing Officer to verify the figures provided by the assessee for the calculation of the percentage of revenue attributable to work done in India under Section 44BB.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 17:34:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431810" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 958 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183596</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay dismissed the appeal and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to remand the case for the Assessing Officer to verify the figures provided by the assessee for the calculation of the percentage of revenue attributable to work done in India under Section 44BB.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183596</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>