<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 649 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183593</link>
    <description>Merely booking and selling newspaper advertisement space, without preparing, making or designing the advertisements, did not constitute advertising agency service. The parties acted only as intermediaries in procuring advertisement orders for the newspaper, and the applicable circular clarified that such limited activity falls outside the scope of advertising agency service. No service tax was therefore leviable on the activity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 17:05:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431807" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 649 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183593</link>
      <description>Merely booking and selling newspaper advertisement space, without preparing, making or designing the advertisements, did not constitute advertising agency service. The parties acted only as intermediaries in procuring advertisement orders for the newspaper, and the applicable circular clarified that such limited activity falls outside the scope of advertising agency service. No service tax was therefore leviable on the activity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183593</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>