<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 52 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3821</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the appeal of M/s. Flexo Polymers (P) Ltd. The judge relied on judgments from different High Courts, distinguishing cases involving forged DEPBs from those where DEPBs were obtained through fraud. The decision emphasized that benefits should not be denied if a DEPB scrip is purchased in good faith and not involved in the fraud. The judgment was pronounced on December 17, 2007.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43169" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 52 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3821</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the appeal of M/s. Flexo Polymers (P) Ltd. The judge relied on judgments from different High Courts, distinguishing cases involving forged DEPBs from those where DEPBs were obtained through fraud. The decision emphasized that benefits should not be denied if a DEPB scrip is purchased in good faith and not involved in the fraud. The judgment was pronounced on December 17, 2007.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>