<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 66 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3811</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the service tax demand on technical know-how fees and royalty payments. It was determined that these payments did not fall under the category of consulting engineer service but were for the transfer of intellectual property rights, which were specifically excluded from service tax. The Tribunal relied on previous rulings and the introduction of a separate category for intellectual property services under the law to support this decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43159" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 66 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3811</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the service tax demand on technical know-how fees and royalty payments. It was determined that these payments did not fall under the category of consulting engineer service but were for the transfer of intellectual property rights, which were specifically excluded from service tax. The Tribunal relied on previous rulings and the introduction of a separate category for intellectual property services under the law to support this decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3811</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>