<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 48 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3809</link>
    <description>Penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994 may be waived where reasonable cause is shown for delay in payment of service tax. On the facts noted, service tax was a new levy and the record reflected confusion about collection, payment, and procedural requirements; the lower appellate authority therefore invoked Section 80 and condoned the failure. The waiver was held justified and no interference was called for.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43157" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 48 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3809</link>
      <description>Penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994 may be waived where reasonable cause is shown for delay in payment of service tax. On the facts noted, service tax was a new levy and the record reflected confusion about collection, payment, and procedural requirements; the lower appellate authority therefore invoked Section 80 and condoned the failure. The waiver was held justified and no interference was called for.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>