<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 569 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183589</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to include interest income for deduction u/s 80IB was dismissed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that the interest income derived from debtors on late payment should be included in the deduction calculation. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer incorrectly treated miscellaneous receipts as business income eligible for deduction u/s 80IB.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 13:10:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431562" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 569 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183589</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to include interest income for deduction u/s 80IB was dismissed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that the interest income derived from debtors on late payment should be included in the deduction calculation. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer incorrectly treated miscellaneous receipts as business income eligible for deduction u/s 80IB.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183589</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>