<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (11) TMI 5 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3807</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on inputs remained available where final products were cleared under Chapter X on the strength of a CT-2 certificate without payment of duty, because such clearances were not treated as clearance of wholly exempt goods or goods chargeable to nil rate of duty. Earlier decisions had already settled that clearance under Chapter X or under bond is materially different from exempt clearances, so Rule 57C of the Central Excise Rules did not apply. The denial of credit was therefore unsustainable, and the credit was admissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43155" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (11) TMI 5 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3807</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on inputs remained available where final products were cleared under Chapter X on the strength of a CT-2 certificate without payment of duty, because such clearances were not treated as clearance of wholly exempt goods or goods chargeable to nil rate of duty. Earlier decisions had already settled that clearance under Chapter X or under bond is materially different from exempt clearances, so Rule 57C of the Central Excise Rules did not apply. The denial of credit was therefore unsustainable, and the credit was admissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3807</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>