<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 543 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328834</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that supplies to SEZ are exports under the SEZ Act 2005 and SEZ Rules 2006, entitling them to benefits under various laws. The appellant was granted a refund under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, as SEZ supplies were deemed eligible for such refunds. The Tribunal set aside the lower authority&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2016 10:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431541" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 543 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328834</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that supplies to SEZ are exports under the SEZ Act 2005 and SEZ Rules 2006, entitling them to benefits under various laws. The appellant was granted a refund under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, as SEZ supplies were deemed eligible for such refunds. The Tribunal set aside the lower authority&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328834</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>