<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 540 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328831</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for proper classification, emphasizing the importance of accurate classification and due procedure in excise matters. The Court criticized the misdirection by the Assistant Collector and highlighted the need for a fresh assessment following due process of law. The previous orders were based on a flawed premise as the revisionary authority had not finalized the classification, leaving it open for adjudication. The Dy. Commissioner and Commissioner (Appeals) finalized the classification under Tariff item 33(3) for electric fans used in various appliances, contrary to the appellants&#039; belief in exemption under Tariff item 29A.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431538" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 540 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328831</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for proper classification, emphasizing the importance of accurate classification and due procedure in excise matters. The Court criticized the misdirection by the Assistant Collector and highlighted the need for a fresh assessment following due process of law. The previous orders were based on a flawed premise as the revisionary authority had not finalized the classification, leaving it open for adjudication. The Dy. Commissioner and Commissioner (Appeals) finalized the classification under Tariff item 33(3) for electric fans used in various appliances, contrary to the appellants&#039; belief in exemption under Tariff item 29A.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328831</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>