<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 183 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3804</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the rebate claim for Central Excise duty on the export product &quot;DP Resin.&quot; Despite initial concerns raised by Central Excise authorities regarding Cenvat credit and rebate admissibility, the Tribunal found the manufacturing process technically and commercially feasible. Invoices discrepancies and raw material availability issues were addressed with evidence provided by the assessee. The Tribunal upheld the legitimacy of Cenvat credit availed and granted the rebate based on duty paid, citing legal precedents and Chief Commissioner clarifications. Penalties imposed were set aside, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43152" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 183 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3804</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the rebate claim for Central Excise duty on the export product &quot;DP Resin.&quot; Despite initial concerns raised by Central Excise authorities regarding Cenvat credit and rebate admissibility, the Tribunal found the manufacturing process technically and commercially feasible. Invoices discrepancies and raw material availability issues were addressed with evidence provided by the assessee. The Tribunal upheld the legitimacy of Cenvat credit availed and granted the rebate based on duty paid, citing legal precedents and Chief Commissioner clarifications. Penalties imposed were set aside, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>