<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 530 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328821</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, holding that business loss can be adjusted against any head of income, including Capital Gains, as per Section 71 of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT directed the AO to set off the business loss against income under &quot;Other sources&quot; before Capital Gains, ensuring maximum benefit to the assessee. The decision emphasized interpreting tax statutes in favor of the assessee and clarified the sequence for adjusting business loss against various income heads, providing relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 09:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431517" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 530 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328821</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, holding that business loss can be adjusted against any head of income, including Capital Gains, as per Section 71 of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT directed the AO to set off the business loss against income under &quot;Other sources&quot; before Capital Gains, ensuring maximum benefit to the assessee. The decision emphasized interpreting tax statutes in favor of the assessee and clarified the sequence for adjusting business loss against various income heads, providing relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>