https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183574 Under section 11(1) of the Special Courts Act, 1979, an order framing charge was treated as an interlocutory order because it forms part of the trial process and does not finally terminate the proceedings or determine the parties' rights. The majority held that the expression "interlocutory order" must be read in its ordinary sense, the non obstante clause prevents enlargement of appeal rights by reference to the Criminal Procedure Code, and appeals from charge-framing orders would frustrate the Act's object of speedy disposal. The dissent considered such an order to substantially affect the accused's liberty and rights, and therefore not interlocutory. en-us Fri, 07 Dec 1979 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Jun 2016 17:43:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183574 Under section 11(1) of the Special Courts Act, 1979, an order framing charge was treated as an interlocutory order because it forms part of the trial process and does not finally terminate the proceedings or determine the parties' rights. The majority held that the expression "interlocutory order" must be read in its ordinary sense, the non obstante clause prevents enlargement of appeal rights by reference to the Criminal Procedure Code, and appeals from charge-framing orders would frustrate the Act's object of speedy disposal. The dissent considered such an order to substantially affect the accused's liberty and rights, and therefore not interlocutory. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 07 Dec 1979 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183574