<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 505 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328796</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the impugned order revoking the Custom&#039;s Broker license and forfeiting the bank guarantee, emphasizing the importance of adhering to the time limit prescribed in Regulation 20(1) of CBLR 2013. The judgment favored the petitioner, highlighting the significance of procedural regularity and statutory timeline adherence in administrative actions, ensuring protection of procedural rights and due process in regulatory proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 13:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 505 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328796</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the impugned order revoking the Custom&#039;s Broker license and forfeiting the bank guarantee, emphasizing the importance of adhering to the time limit prescribed in Regulation 20(1) of CBLR 2013. The judgment favored the petitioner, highlighting the significance of procedural regularity and statutory timeline adherence in administrative actions, ensuring protection of procedural rights and due process in regulatory proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328796</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>