<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 503 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328794</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court reversed a Division Bench judgment, establishing tax liability under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 for businesses processing and supplying photographs. The High Court upheld the constitutionality of Entry 25 of the Act, confirming the tax liability. The court directed a fresh assessment by the Assessing Authority to consider input tax credit and deductions for net VAT liability, allowing the petitioners to make claims within six months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 13:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431451" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 503 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328794</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court reversed a Division Bench judgment, establishing tax liability under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 for businesses processing and supplying photographs. The High Court upheld the constitutionality of Entry 25 of the Act, confirming the tax liability. The court directed a fresh assessment by the Assessing Authority to consider input tax credit and deductions for net VAT liability, allowing the petitioners to make claims within six months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328794</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>