https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328790 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant and holding that the CIT was not justified in withdrawing the registration granted under Section 12A. The Tribunal found that the appellant's activities were charitable in nature, with any revenue generated being incidental to the main charitable object. It was emphasized that the CIT's actions exceeded the scope of the directions from the ITAT and were not substantiated by the evidence on record. en-us Thu, 09 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Jun 2016 12:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328790 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant and holding that the CIT was not justified in withdrawing the registration granted under Section 12A. The Tribunal found that the appellant's activities were charitable in nature, with any revenue generated being incidental to the main charitable object. It was emphasized that the CIT's actions exceeded the scope of the directions from the ITAT and were not substantiated by the evidence on record. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 09 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328790