<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 477 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328768</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding certain disallowances and deletions made by the authorities. The Cross Objection of the assessee was dismissed as not pressed. Key issues included the valuation of closing stock, treatment of insurance premium on new vehicles, addition of unproved creditors, disallowance of expenses without TDS deduction, and treatment of Trade Mark Registration expenses. The Tribunal generally favored the Revenue&#039;s position in disallowing certain expenses and additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 10:59:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431409" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 477 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328768</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding certain disallowances and deletions made by the authorities. The Cross Objection of the assessee was dismissed as not pressed. Key issues included the valuation of closing stock, treatment of insurance premium on new vehicles, addition of unproved creditors, disallowance of expenses without TDS deduction, and treatment of Trade Mark Registration expenses. The Tribunal generally favored the Revenue&#039;s position in disallowing certain expenses and additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328768</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>