<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 522 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183553</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay allowed the writ petition to be withdrawn, granting the petitioner the liberty to challenge the impugned order in appeal under Section 35 of the Foreign Exchange and Management Act, 1999. If the appeal remedy is time-barred, the petitioner needs to establish grounds for condonation of delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 10:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431398" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 522 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183553</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay allowed the writ petition to be withdrawn, granting the petitioner the liberty to challenge the impugned order in appeal under Section 35 of the Foreign Exchange and Management Act, 1999. If the appeal remedy is time-barred, the petitioner needs to establish grounds for condonation of delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183553</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>