<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 596 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183533</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the deduction under s. 80HH should be allowed before considering deductions under s. 32AB. Each industrial unit should be assessed independently for claiming relief under s. 80HH, ensuring that the deduction is based solely on the profit of that specific unit without being affected by losses from other industries owned by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2016 17:21:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431377" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 596 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183533</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the deduction under s. 80HH should be allowed before considering deductions under s. 32AB. Each industrial unit should be assessed independently for claiming relief under s. 80HH, ensuring that the deduction is based solely on the profit of that specific unit without being affected by losses from other industries owned by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183533</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>