<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (4) TMI 100 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183532</link>
    <description>In bonus computation under the Payment of Bonus Act, direct tax must be worked out on gross profits after prior charges, but without first deducting the bonus payable for the year, and the earlier settled method was affirmed. Ex-gratia payments made to higher-paid employees outside the statutory bonus formula were not deductible from gross profits. Return on provision for doubtful debts remained inadmissible in gross-profit computation. The objections concerning voluntary retirement scheme expenditure, extra shift allowance, repairs and renewals, and set-on for the prior year were rejected on the facts, while voluntary retirement expenditure was treated as an allowable commercial outgoing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2016 17:14:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431375" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (4) TMI 100 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183532</link>
      <description>In bonus computation under the Payment of Bonus Act, direct tax must be worked out on gross profits after prior charges, but without first deducting the bonus payable for the year, and the earlier settled method was affirmed. Ex-gratia payments made to higher-paid employees outside the statutory bonus formula were not deductible from gross profits. Return on provision for doubtful debts remained inadmissible in gross-profit computation. The objections concerning voluntary retirement scheme expenditure, extra shift allowance, repairs and renewals, and set-on for the prior year were rejected on the facts, while voluntary retirement expenditure was treated as an allowable commercial outgoing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183532</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>