<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 43 - High Court Punjab and Haryana</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3789</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing that penalties under Section 271(1)(c) cannot be levied when additions are made on an estimated basis, as established by previous judgments. The appeals filed by the Revenue were dismissed based on this settled proposition of law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 08:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43137" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 43 - High Court Punjab and Haryana</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3789</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing that penalties under Section 271(1)(c) cannot be levied when additions are made on an estimated basis, as established by previous judgments. The appeals filed by the Revenue were dismissed based on this settled proposition of law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3789</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>