<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 470 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328761</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the entitlement to avail Cenvat credit of Excise duty paid by the principal manufacturer. The tribunal held that once the duty of Excise was paid by utilizing the credit availed, it amounted to reversal of credit. The tribunal did not delve into whether the process undertaken by the appellant amounted to manufacturing, as legal grounds were sufficient to decide the case. The penalty imposed on the appellant and Managing Director was set aside due to a procedural lapse, as the appellant had already reversed the credit with interest before the show-cause notice was issued.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 12:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431360" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 470 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328761</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the entitlement to avail Cenvat credit of Excise duty paid by the principal manufacturer. The tribunal held that once the duty of Excise was paid by utilizing the credit availed, it amounted to reversal of credit. The tribunal did not delve into whether the process undertaken by the appellant amounted to manufacturing, as legal grounds were sufficient to decide the case. The penalty imposed on the appellant and Managing Director was set aside due to a procedural lapse, as the appellant had already reversed the credit with interest before the show-cause notice was issued.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328761</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>