https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328756 The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the order dated 27.07.2012, remanding the case for denovo adjudication by the Commissioner. The appellant company, engaged in manufacturing un-coated kraft papers from waste, faced issues of stock discrepancies, shortages, and lack of proper maintenance. Allegations of clandestine removal of goods without duty payment led to duty levy and penalties. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of cross-examination and compliance with procedural requirements, setting aside the previous order. The appellants were granted opportunities for cross-examination, inspection of documents, and a fair hearing process before the authority. en-us Thu, 21 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Nov 2016 15:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328756 The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the order dated 27.07.2012, remanding the case for denovo adjudication by the Commissioner. The appellant company, engaged in manufacturing un-coated kraft papers from waste, faced issues of stock discrepancies, shortages, and lack of proper maintenance. Allegations of clandestine removal of goods without duty payment led to duty levy and penalties. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of cross-examination and compliance with procedural requirements, setting aside the previous order. The appellants were granted opportunities for cross-examination, inspection of documents, and a fair hearing process before the authority. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 21 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328756