https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328754 The Tribunal clarified the necessity of filing separate appeals for different adjudication orders, allowed CENVAT credit on specific services for an exporter/domestic seller of sugar, and deemed CENVAT credit for subscription to association/clubs/periodicals as inadmissible. The delay in filing appeals was condoned due to confusion regarding the need for separate appeals. No penalty was imposed as no malafide intent was found in the appellant's claim. Both Miscellaneous Applications were allowed, and the appeals were disposed of accordingly. en-us Mon, 18 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Nov 2016 14:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328754 The Tribunal clarified the necessity of filing separate appeals for different adjudication orders, allowed CENVAT credit on specific services for an exporter/domestic seller of sugar, and deemed CENVAT credit for subscription to association/clubs/periodicals as inadmissible. The delay in filing appeals was condoned due to confusion regarding the need for separate appeals. No penalty was imposed as no malafide intent was found in the appellant's claim. Both Miscellaneous Applications were allowed, and the appeals were disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 18 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328754