<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 458 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328749</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee primarily on the ground that the order under Section 263 was barred by limitation, as it was not dispatched and served within the prescribed period. Consequently, other grounds raised by the assessee were dismissed as they required no further adjudication. The appeal was thus allowed, and the order was pronounced in the open court on 10-06-2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2016 13:15:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431331" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 458 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328749</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee primarily on the ground that the order under Section 263 was barred by limitation, as it was not dispatched and served within the prescribed period. Consequently, other grounds raised by the assessee were dismissed as they required no further adjudication. The appeal was thus allowed, and the order was pronounced in the open court on 10-06-2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328749</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>