<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 452 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328743</link>
    <description>Deduction under Chapter VI-A, including section 80IB(10), is computed against gross total income subject to the statutory ceiling under section 80A, and is not confined only to business or professional income, though eligible business profits determine the amount available for deduction. On that basis, the deduction was allowed up to gross total income in favour of the assessee. Reassessment under sections 147 and 148 cannot stand where the recorded reasons rest on an incorrect legal premise, and here the reopening was founded on the mistaken view that the deduction could be set only against business income. The reassessment was therefore invalid and bad in law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2016 13:15:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431325" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 452 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328743</link>
      <description>Deduction under Chapter VI-A, including section 80IB(10), is computed against gross total income subject to the statutory ceiling under section 80A, and is not confined only to business or professional income, though eligible business profits determine the amount available for deduction. On that basis, the deduction was allowed up to gross total income in favour of the assessee. Reassessment under sections 147 and 148 cannot stand where the recorded reasons rest on an incorrect legal premise, and here the reopening was founded on the mistaken view that the deduction could be set only against business income. The reassessment was therefore invalid and bad in law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328743</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>