<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 451 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328742</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to use the Fair Market Value declared by the assessee for indexation, disallow indexation on claimed improvement costs, allow deduction under Section 54 for both residential flats, and consider the actual sale consideration for computing exemption under Section 54. The order was pronounced on 30/05/2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2016 13:15:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431324" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 451 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328742</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to use the Fair Market Value declared by the assessee for indexation, disallow indexation on claimed improvement costs, allow deduction under Section 54 for both residential flats, and consider the actual sale consideration for computing exemption under Section 54. The order was pronounced on 30/05/2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328742</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>