https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328736 The Tribunal directed the appellant, a security service provider, to reconcile accounts to determine accurate tax liability of Rs. 45,70,281 instead of Rs. 52,54,860 due to delayed filings and centralized accounts. It emphasized proper penalty imposition aligning with outstanding balances and instructed re-adjudication to ensure compliance with the law. Despite Revenue's objection, the Tribunal remanded the case for further proceedings, allowing a 25% concessional penalty if warranted, stressing the appellant's right to reconciliation and a timely adjudication within three months. en-us Thu, 19 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Mar 2018 16:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328736 The Tribunal directed the appellant, a security service provider, to reconcile accounts to determine accurate tax liability of Rs. 45,70,281 instead of Rs. 52,54,860 due to delayed filings and centralized accounts. It emphasized proper penalty imposition aligning with outstanding balances and instructed re-adjudication to ensure compliance with the law. Despite Revenue's objection, the Tribunal remanded the case for further proceedings, allowing a 25% concessional penalty if warranted, stressing the appellant's right to reconciliation and a timely adjudication within three months. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 19 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328736