<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 191 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3781</link>
    <description>Remission of duty on storage loss of molasses cannot be denied merely on an allegation that the assessee failed to take due care and precaution where the loss is established as storage loss and remains within the condonable limit prescribed by the applicable circular. Here, the storage loss was 0.68% and 0.36% for the relevant seasons, both within the 2% condonable threshold. On that basis, the rejection of remission was held unsustainable and relief was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43129" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 191 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3781</link>
      <description>Remission of duty on storage loss of molasses cannot be denied merely on an allegation that the assessee failed to take due care and precaution where the loss is established as storage loss and remains within the condonable limit prescribed by the applicable circular. Here, the storage loss was 0.68% and 0.36% for the relevant seasons, both within the 2% condonable threshold. On that basis, the rejection of remission was held unsustainable and relief was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3781</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>