<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 438 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328729</link>
    <description>The Court granted an extension for compliance with the pre-deposit order, setting aside the dismissal of appeals by CESTAT for non-compliance due to the failure to consider undue financial hardship. The appellant, M/s. Neycer India Limited, was given three weeks to make the required deposit, with the stay petitions to be restored upon compliance. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeals were disposed of with no costs, allowing the appellant to pursue the appeals further.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2016 13:06:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 438 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328729</link>
      <description>The Court granted an extension for compliance with the pre-deposit order, setting aside the dismissal of appeals by CESTAT for non-compliance due to the failure to consider undue financial hardship. The appellant, M/s. Neycer India Limited, was given three weeks to make the required deposit, with the stay petitions to be restored upon compliance. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeals were disposed of with no costs, allowing the appellant to pursue the appeals further.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328729</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>