<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 434 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328725</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the adjudicating authority for a fresh consideration of the classification issue under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The appellant was directed to submit all relevant case laws and expert opinions to support their argument. It was emphasized that factual submissions needed verification and a personal hearing should be granted to the appellant for a fair decision in the remand proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2016 13:06:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431282" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 434 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328725</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the adjudicating authority for a fresh consideration of the classification issue under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The appellant was directed to submit all relevant case laws and expert opinions to support their argument. It was emphasized that factual submissions needed verification and a personal hearing should be granted to the appellant for a fair decision in the remand proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328725</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>