<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 665 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183513</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the AO for reconsideration, finding that the AO did not adequately confront the notings on the registries or verify the actual purchase rates. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, setting aside the assessment order. The decision was issued on 14-10-2011.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2016 13:01:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431281" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 665 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183513</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the AO for reconsideration, finding that the AO did not adequately confront the notings on the registries or verify the actual purchase rates. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, setting aside the assessment order. The decision was issued on 14-10-2011.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183513</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>