https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183508 A Supreme Court decision on court-martial review under the Army Act, 1950, noted that a convening order issued by a competent authority under Section 109 on a valid warrant, and the statutory appointment of court-martial members, satisfied legality requirements. The record also showed participation of the accused, opportunity to cross-examine witnesses, and consideration of a voluntary confessional statement and additional summary statement alongside oral evidence. In judicial review under Article 226, the writ court was confined to examining legality and fairness of the process and could not reappreciate evidence or sit in appeal over findings of guilt. On that basis, interference with the conviction and sentence was held unjustified. en-us Thu, 10 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Jun 2016 12:25:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183508 A Supreme Court decision on court-martial review under the Army Act, 1950, noted that a convening order issued by a competent authority under Section 109 on a valid warrant, and the statutory appointment of court-martial members, satisfied legality requirements. The record also showed participation of the accused, opportunity to cross-examine witnesses, and consideration of a voluntary confessional statement and additional summary statement alongside oral evidence. In judicial review under Article 226, the writ court was confined to examining legality and fairness of the process and could not reappreciate evidence or sit in appeal over findings of guilt. On that basis, interference with the conviction and sentence was held unjustified. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 10 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183508