<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 1056 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183499</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed M/s STI&#039;s appeal to the extent that demands of CVD raised by invoking the extended period of limitation were deemed unsustainable. The demand of CVD under the normal period was upheld, while penalties under Section 11AC were set aside due to the lack of intent to evade duty. Both appeals were disposed of, along with cross objections filed by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2016 12:00:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431267" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 1056 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183499</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed M/s STI&#039;s appeal to the extent that demands of CVD raised by invoking the extended period of limitation were deemed unsustainable. The demand of CVD under the normal period was upheld, while penalties under Section 11AC were set aside due to the lack of intent to evade duty. Both appeals were disposed of, along with cross objections filed by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183499</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>