https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183501 The court rejected the writ petitions challenging re-assessment orders, stating that the petitioner had the opportunity to present evidence and appear before the reassessing authority. The court emphasized the absence of a violation of natural justice principles and advised the petitioner to address concerns through the appellate authority. The court found no grounds for interference under Article 226 of the Constitution but granted liberty to challenge the orders before the appellate authority. The office was directed to promptly return certified copies of annexures, and the appellate authority was to consider the writ petitions' pendency in case of appeal delays. en-us Mon, 21 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Jun 2016 12:00:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183501 The court rejected the writ petitions challenging re-assessment orders, stating that the petitioner had the opportunity to present evidence and appear before the reassessing authority. The court emphasized the absence of a violation of natural justice principles and advised the petitioner to address concerns through the appellate authority. The court found no grounds for interference under Article 226 of the Constitution but granted liberty to challenge the orders before the appellate authority. The office was directed to promptly return certified copies of annexures, and the appellate authority was to consider the writ petitions' pendency in case of appeal delays. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 21 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183501