<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 40 - High Court Punjab and Haryana</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3778</link>
    <description>The HC upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under Section 158BFA(2) of the Income Tax Act, concluding that the assessee did not deliberately conceal income. The Court determined that the assessee had time to file the return under Section 139(4) and had paid advance tax, rendering the Revenue&#039;s appeal meritless.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Dec 2024 08:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43126" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 40 - High Court Punjab and Haryana</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3778</link>
      <description>The HC upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under Section 158BFA(2) of the Income Tax Act, concluding that the assessee did not deliberately conceal income. The Court determined that the assessee had time to file the return under Section 139(4) and had paid advance tax, rendering the Revenue&#039;s appeal meritless.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3778</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>