<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 426 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328717</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the issues back to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration and re-valuation. The disallowance of depreciation on non-compete fee, cost of production of TV serials, and the depreciation rate on Film Software Library were all subject to review to ensure alignment with decisions in related cases and proper examination of genuineness and necessity. The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing a thorough re-evaluation of the disputed matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2016 10:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431247" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 426 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328717</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the issues back to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration and re-valuation. The disallowance of depreciation on non-compete fee, cost of production of TV serials, and the depreciation rate on Film Software Library were all subject to review to ensure alignment with decisions in related cases and proper examination of genuineness and necessity. The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing a thorough re-evaluation of the disputed matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328717</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>