<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 130 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3776</link>
    <description>The penalty imposed under Section 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 for misdeclaration of goods and excess drawback claimed was challenged. The Appellate Commissioner upheld the penalty initially imposed but reduced it from Rs.95,730/- to Rs.20,000/-. The reduction was justified based on the circumstances of the case, emphasizing that the penalty should align with the purpose of the law. The appellant&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, resulting in a reduced penalty amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 May 2022 16:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43124" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 130 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3776</link>
      <description>The penalty imposed under Section 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 for misdeclaration of goods and excess drawback claimed was challenged. The Appellate Commissioner upheld the penalty initially imposed but reduced it from Rs.95,730/- to Rs.20,000/-. The reduction was justified based on the circumstances of the case, emphasizing that the penalty should align with the purpose of the law. The appellant&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, resulting in a reduced penalty amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3776</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>